Thursday, February 20, 2014

HUFF Cafe upholds, defends and restores inDIYpendent culture (if for only 2 hours)

Human Rights abuse in itty-bitty Santa Cruz: [link]
Santa Cruz attacking houseless people: [link]
Santa Cruz attacks independent arts, culture and artisan vendors [link]

2013-02-25 Update: Santa Cruz PD's use of a provacateur against the HUFF Cafe has been documented, with eyewitnesses and audio-recording, according to the report "Santa Cruz's anti-Constitutional exclusion zones under investigation by Dr. John Colby, the Gorilla Advocate" [link]

"Successful Protest Against Backpack Bigotry Restores Street Scene for Two Hours"
2014-02-20 by Robert Norse []:
Comment from
@: what a great spot for a protest occupation, giving free coffee to the oppressed classes in front of a discriminating coffee shoppe at the very center of the downtown mall of fascism. i bet the downtown association wishes you would do it somewhere more remote like lulus or san lorenzo.why pay for capitalist coffee, when the uprising blend is free.
Cafe HUFF's sidewalk stop-and-slp station fielded mini-cups of free coffee to musicians, activists, sign-totters, tourists, and students outside the Coffee Roasting Company. The focus was a protest on anti-homeless Backpack Bans infecting the Roaster, Peets, Starbucks, Lulu Carpenters and other businesses downtown. We encouraged Roaster patrons to question the policy and encourage the management to restore fairer treatment. Even the six cops assigned to surveille the decaf demo were invited to lift a cup (but declined). One angry defender of the police tore up a sign, but otherwise participants endorsed the protest with enthusiasm Well satisfied with the two-hour long anti-discrimination demo, they vowed to return next Wednesday to continue the public educational process.

About 20 people maintained a persistent colorful presence on the sidewalk outside the Coffee Roasting Company and adjacent shops early Wednesday afternoon between 1 and 3 PM, tabling, singing, carrying signs, gathering information, and answering questions from passersby.
A number of us gave impassioned speeches urging fair or at least equal treatment of homeless people (i.e. those with fewer options for storing their backpacks), but the only response of the management was to (a) attempt to police the sidewalk in front of the entranceway by directing people away, and (b) apparently repeatedly calling the police, though Officer Azua wasn't specific about who was "complaining".
One impassioned street musician, who'd seen his friend Briana Brewer heavily harassed by "Hospitality" yellow-jackets, went in and tore up a dollar bill in front of the management. Another stood by the door way with a sign urging people not to enter.

Musicians and protesters splayed out along the sidewalk in what were arguably "illegal" positions under the Bryant-Robinson legislation. What I call the "Sidewalk Shrinkage" law changes passed last fall on a 5-2 vote. They limited performer space to telephone booth-sized 12 square feet, banned blankets on the ground, & added new forbidden zones (to "protect" the new red "Scared-and-Stingey is-the-new-Smart" No Sparechange meters and trash cans) and require "12' separation" between anyone with a political table, sparechange cup, open guitar case, or other "display device". The pretext for this 'sanitize the sidewalks' attack was "trip and fall" hazard (no instances cited), and "sidewalk sale-style clutter". Robinson, Comstock, and Mathews either explicitly or implicitly supported this picture.

Passions got high at points. One confused homeless person, seeing a poster that pictured a gunman labeled Public Safety Task Force executing a homeless person (see ) continued screeching that this was an libelous attack on her "friends" in the SCPD. She ended up grabbing the sign out of the hands of woman and ripping it up, then continued to loudly berate and threaten protesters. She finally calmed down when I threatened her with a formal complaint for theft and vandalism and ultimately shook my hand and said she'd replace the item.
A tip of the hat to Sgt. Bush and Officer Wilson, whose mediation skills (or perhaps suitable threats--I didn't hear the conversation) persuaded the sign seizer to back off.

Police at instances acted as merchant security guards, insisting that people not stand with signs at the entrance of the coffee shop. In fact, Officer Azua didn't disagree that one only obstructed the sidewalk when you refused to move when asked to do so--and the lone protester who kept returning to the entrance of the cafe did not block anyone, but continued to be threatened by Azua. Azua repeatedly instructed the man "not to block the entrance"--which he wasn't. The young demonstrator held a sign with an "ask why before you buy" style message. Azua later urged me to "exercise leadership" and noted they had many photos that could be used as evidence. Evidence of standing or of actually blocking? No reply. The point being that merchants and police are not the arbiters of the sidewalk and protesters would not be bullied into surrendering that authority to them.
When Azua confronted me to demand as the leader of the protest that I "cooperate" with the police, a protester shouted out "he's not our leader" and I had to agree. Better days may be in store as people begin to make independent decisions in these situations and exercise their own leadershiip.
It seemed a hefty waste of public money to see five police officers standing across the street in front of Camouflage, apparently watching the protest for its first half hour or so. Deputy-Chief Martinez came out of Starbucks (another Backpack Banning joint). He declined to answer why his SCPD had stopped at-risk kids from getting bikes by freezing out the Bike Church for two years starting in 2012.
The police generally wisely refrained from pulling out ticket books and enforcing the mesh of downtown ordinance violations that conceivably could have been charged. The energy of the crowd and determination of the protesters--plus the fact that the absurd laws had nothing to do with any kind of real safety concerns--may have been a factor in restoring a two-hour return to a sane vibrant street scene.

Some folks videoed and hopefully they will post what they saw. Numerous long-time street singers stopped and played.
The protest came on the day the news about the exile of The Great Morgani hit. Looks like the use of these laws to scare away "unsightly" homeless have ended up doing what opponents have always argued would happen: land on the heads of traditional commercially-viable and attractive performers like the colorfully-dressed accordion player, who has left the scene in disgust after being threatened with ticketing.
Indybay's latest story is the shutdown of The Great Morgani by officious cops enforcing the Forbidden Zone and Move Along laws. The outrage against the exile of Morgani has been palpable and near-unanimous (even on the Sentinel's hate-happy Disquis Topix comments following the article: ...).
Bubble performer and street performers guild activist Tom Noddy will be on Free Radio Sana Cruz tonight at 101.3 FM discussing the latest crisis in the Street Performer Crackdown. The show archives at [].

Protesters convened outside City Hall and debated their next move for another half-hour, deciding to return with a renewed and enlarged protest next Wednesday at 1 PM at the same place. There will be an interim organizational meeting 4:30 PM at the main post office during the Food Not Bombs meal. There was widespread satisfaction and enthusiasm at the success of the protest and the belief that continuing the educational campaign would ultimately lead to change.
In the meantime, contact your local cafe and ensure that they don't ban backpacks or discriminate against the homeless. Pass on what you earn here or more widely on Yelp and Facebook! Spread the word and bring your music down to the Coffee Roasting Company next Wednesday.

"Cafe HUFF to Research Backpack Bigotry near Coffee Roasting Company, Wednesday, 1 PM"
2014-02-16 by Robert Norse (rnorse3 [at] from "Homeless United for Friendship and Freedom (HUFF) - Santa Cruz" []:
Following up on an earlier survey where the Coffee Roasting Company, Starbucks, and Peets acknowledged they were banning people carrying backpacks--and on the heels of reports of exclusionary policies at the Cafe Pergolesi (Backpacks Allowed) and the Abbey Cafe, HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) voted last week to sample public opinion and observe policy in front of the Coffee Roasting Company in downtown Santa Cruz to raise its concerns about anti-homeless discrimination. HUFF will provide coffee as long as it lasts in order to encourage participation and discussion.

The earlier survey is described at [].
Since then HUFF had continued to receive reports of homeless-looking people, travelers, and youth facing exclusion, even after paying for service at various businesses.
Some have suggested the the apparent spread of exclusionary policies at coffee shops have driven folks to more traditionally liberal venues like the Cafe Pergolesi. In response police have been threatening Cafe Pergolesi with a crackdown and Pergolesi management has responded by not only evicting some paying but homeless-looking customers, but also directing people on the public sidewalk to "move along".
Other reports have noted the crackdown of SCPD zealots like CSO Barnett on Pacific Avenue (reportedly targeting scarflady Kate W and harassing other musicians), Parks and Recreation Ranger seizure of homeless survival gear along the riverbank reported by Ricardo Lopez, and discriminatory enforcement of the "no dogs after dark downtown" where police are reportedly accosting homeless-looking dog owners and actually seizing some of them. Others report heavy-handed security "First Alarm" guards at the library and surrounding areas, denying a disabled man access to the disabled library bathroom, and security thug "Big John" driving those who nod out out of the library.
In addition, we've received reports of Officer Azua & other Sleepsnatchers repeatedly ticketing sleepers outside for "illegal sleeping" when there is shelter for less than 5% of the homeless community and the weather is creating a public safety hazard for the poor outside.
In the past HUFF has proposed a code of conduct, an appeal process, and a non-discrimination pledge as well as peer pressure. The goal now to ensure that innocent people are not unfairly targeted in the increasingly anti-homeless "Take Back Santa Cruz"-style wave of hostility that has spread over Santa Cruz.

No comments:

Post a Comment